Because You Say...

Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased in goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked: I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich, and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve that thou mayest see.  Revelation 3:17,18

I have had on occasion a certain image course through my mind.  I wonder if you might bear with me, and as I describe this image, try to picture it as well.  This is a fictitious image, yet one that may make a strong impression upon those which “have ears to hear” it, and even upon them which do not, in which case it may serve as a “thorn in the flesh,” an unwanted challenge to an established ideology.

Ready?

In my mind, I have pictured a large gathering of believers assembled in a certain place.  Whether a large church building, or a convention center is irrelevant.  There is an excitement in the air, as this large assembly awaits a highly respected evangelist to enter.  At last, the awaited speaker arrives, with not a hair out of place, perfectly manicured nails, a suit and watch which speak of considerable success, and lastly, a large ring.  Shortly thereafter, he is officially announced and enters the pulpit, and enjoins the great congregation to stand with him. He then begins to speak in a strong voice:

Evangelist:  “Praise the Lord!”

Congregation:  “Praise the Lord!”

Evangelist:  “Say this with me, ‘I am the righteousness of God.’”

Congregation:  “I am the righteousness of God.”

Evangelist:  “I am blessed with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places.”

Congregation:  “I am blessed with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places.”

Evangelist:  “I am the head, and not the tail, I am only above, and not underneath, I have authority over all the power of the enemy.”

Congregation:  “I am the head and not the tail, I am only above and not underneath, I have authority over all the power of the enemy.”

Evangelist:  “I am not poor, I am rich, my needs are met and I have need of nothing.”

Congregation:  “I am not poor, I am rich, my needs are met, and I have need of nothing.”

Evangelist:  “AMEN!”

Congregation:  “AMEN!”

Then the congregation breaks into spontaneous praise and loud applause- for what, I know not.  Do they applaud themselves? Or is it the evangelist? Or is it the Lord?  I think it’s the Lord.

But as the applause begins to wane, and before the speaker begins his message, a most outstanding thing occurs.  A certain figure appears at the rear of this great room.  He does not speak, but slowly walks toward the stage.  His eyes are crystal clear, and his face radiant.  Many, who see him, recognize him immediately- others do not- but all feel compelled to look upon him, sensing that He has something to say.  When he reaches the podium, He opens the evangelist’s bible to the third chapter of Revelation, and hands it back to him. And looking over the great congregation He begins to say:

“BECAUSE YOU SAY, ‘I am rich, and increased in goods, and have need of nothing;’ and you do not know that you are wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked; I counsel you to buy from me gold tried in the fire, that you may be rich, and white garments, that you may be clothed, so that the shame of your nakedness does not appear; and anoint your eyes with eyesalve, that you may see.’”

And without a further word, He passes through their midst, and He is gone…

As I said earlier, this is obviously a fictitious scene.  However, other than the appearance of the Lord, The rest of the scene could possibly play out exactly as I have described.  I have often thought that the corporate “faith confessions” quite common in certain evangelical circles often sound very much like the attitude of the Laodicean church which Christ so severely rebuked.  In fact, I am quite certain that it would be easy to get many Christians within these circles to zealously stand and confidently confess, “I am rich, and increased in goods, and have need of nothing!”  And this they would boldly confess, thinking themselves to somehow do the word of God great honour, when in truth, they actually repeat the very thoughts of them which were indeed in gross error regarding the whole of God’s word, and which were contrary to the spirit of the true Christian faith.  Sadly, not only do I think that this scenario is possible, and easily created, but I am confident that it indeed has happened already as I have described.

So one may argue, “What does it prove if the above scenario has occurred?  The people, who confess these things, though they may unwittingly use the words of the Laodiceans, certainly intend something different.”  But it does indeed prove something.  It proves that they are not as familiar with the word of God as they think- else they would be ashamed to use the same words, or similar words of the Laodiceans.  And if so oblivious to the word of God here, does it not follow that their particular expression of the Christian faith may be grossly flawed in other areas as well?  For if one can be so foolish as to parrot the very words which drew such a scathing rebuke from Christ, then how many other foolish ideas has he swallowed along the way?

Thus, I write, in the hope that the comparisons that I make between the modern evangelicals - especially they of “charismatic” persuasion- and the ancient Laodiceans, may stir some to re-evaluate their position and philosophy regarding their beliefs. Now I must state for the record that I am neither “anti-charismatic,” nor “anti-Pentecostal,” but rather one who is opposed to a certain mentality, attitude, and philosophy that unfortunately are prevalent within these camps.

Now what precisely did Christ take issue with regarding the Laodiceans?  He begins with the nature of their devotion:

I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot.  So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spew thee out of my mouth.  Rev.3 15, 16

The Laodiceans were not entirely contrary to the Christian faith. They were a church, they regularly came together, and they professed faith in Jesus Christ.  However, their devotion was void of passion for Jesus himself. They were compromisers; they were not altogether in the world, but they were definitely not in heart committed to Christ.  They thought themselves acceptable, but were unacceptable in his eyes and offensive to him.

I am certain that this could be applicable to various churches throughout the ages, this charge of being lukewarm. However, it is especially applicable to the modern evangelical church as a whole:  For the evangelical church of today is becoming less and less distinguishable from the world with each year that passes.  The enormous amount of moral compromise that is accepted among today’s evangelicals, I have addressed in other posts, and thus I will refrain from commenting again on those specific issues here.

After taking issue with the offensive nature of their lukewarm devotion, The Lord addresses their attitude.  This is addressed in our text: Because thou sayest, I am rich… and have need of nothing.  I am not sure if they actually said these words with their lips, but they certainly said them with their attitude.  It would appear from this verse, that the Laodicean believers interpreted their prosperous natural state as being somehow confirmative of a prosperous spiritual state as well.  I have need of nothing indicates an air of cockiness, of having “already attained,” and of spiritual superiority.  They considered themselves to be quite secure in God.

Now is not this attitude of the Laodiceans reproduced “a hundredfold” in certain evangelicals today?  I do not think that the Laodiceans necessarily verbalized the words of our text, but rather that Christ addressed the attitude of their heart.  How much more offensive to Christ are those believers today who not only have this same attitude in heart, but are actually zealous to proclaim it with their mouths?  Likewise, the Laodiceans erred in interpreting a prosperous natural state to be indicative of a healthy spiritual state.  But evangelicals today take it further by preaching and asserting this to be actual truth!  And if any dare raise an objection to their particular slant on scripture, he or she will be considered “unbelieving” and “unenlightened.”

But these modern “charismatics” have surpassed the Laodiceans in cockiness and arrogance many times over.  For these believers cannot abstain from proclaiming great things about themselves and one another.  They also openly mock and taunt the devil, boasting of all their triumphs over him, and exalt themselves as they whom the devil should fear.  And this some of their leaders do while at the same time they themselves serve the devil in adultery, homosexuality, embezzlement, fraud, and greed.   

And yet the angels of God would not dare to address the devil in the way that these do.  As it is written:

Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.  Jude 9

Still, the attitude of arrogance proceeds:  For this is a movement which can only receive “truth” from itself.  They know very little regarding church history, or the history of doctrine.  They are ignorant of what the church has believed throughout its history, and they do not care to know.  It means nothing to them that many of their views are contrary to that which the saints have held as true from the first century onward.   Moreover, they believe themselves to possess more light than all of the generations before them: for they often flatter their hearers with these very words.

So what can be done with believers who believe that they possess more spiritual insight than all of the saints and martyrs that have gone before them?  Who believe themselves to be as righteous as Jesus Christ regardless of how they live?  Who in their own minds have the power to control the “heavenlies” at will, and the ability to “bind and loose” all things seen and unseen?  Who anxiously wait, not only for the coming of the Lord, but for the wealth of all secular institutions to be released into their hands!

If there is hope for these believers, it is found in our text.  Jesus said to the Laodiceans, “Because you say… and do not know… I counsel you …” In other words, Because you say and profess high and lofty things regarding yourself, when in truth the exact opposite is so, and because you do not know the depth of your error, and your true moral state- I counsel you.  

You see, just because you say, does not make it so.  The Laodiceans rejoiced that they were wealthy, but their riches were only of this world.  They claimed to be rich; Jesus said they were poor.  They confessed that they had need of nothing; Christ told them they were naked.  They thought themselves to have achieved a high spiritual state; the Lord charged them with being wretched.  They believed that they possessed insight, but Christ declared them blind.  They confessed that they were blessed; Jesus exposed them as miserable.

And what response would our modern Laodiceans have if they were charged with being wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked?  They would not receive it, they could not receive it.  They have been trained to view any charge against them as being of the devil, and to believe that God is only capable of telling them wonderful things about themselves.  If the fictitious scene that I earlier described somehow did occur, the congregation would reject the very words of Jesus himself as being “condemnation” and “negative,” and would then break into a confession of their own righteousness, of how they were “the children of God,” and of how “no weapon formed against them will prosper!”

What can be said of a belief system which cannot allow for Christ to speak to the church as He sees fit?  For it is certain within their beliefs, that a believer is not, and can never be considered wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked.  That to even suggest this would in their mind be demonic.  Yet, Jesus uses these very words when addressing certain early believers, who in many ways did not go as far in the error and arrogance that has swallowed the modern “charismatics.”

So what counsel is there from the Lord?  He advises the Laodiceans to do three things: (1) buy of me gold tried in the fire, and white raiment, (2) to anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, and (3) be zealous therefore and repent.

Gold tried in the fire speaks of gold of high value, one that has been refined and is pure.  Impure gold may have value, but it is cheap in comparison to that which has been in the fire.  It may have some lustre, but it lacks depth. The religion of the Laodiceans was similar: cheap and shallow, glorying in their earthly gain, but bankrupt regarding true religion.  How applicable to the modern evangelicals, who being determined to make Christianity more palatable to both themselves and the world, have systematically compromised, gutted, and prostituted the faith, making it a shallow and cheap imitation of that which is truly golden.

White raiment speaks of one thing- purity. The Laodiceans thought so highly of themselves adorned in their expensive garments, but were in truth spiritually naked.  Men may clothe themselves with the very best suits and jewellery, settle for nothing less than the most extravagant accommodations and transportation, and may carry themselves and expect to be treated as princes, but if their faith does not beget purity of life, they are naked.  The exhortation to buy white raiment is a charge to the lukewarm to embrace moral purity as an essential to faith.

Therefore, do not speak to me, O evangelical, about how “blessed” you are while you sit in your dens of iniquity imbibing your poisonous swill, deceiving yourself that you are moderate and thus do not transgress.  Do not speak of the love of God when you in truth do not love him, neither take the name of the Lord upon your lips- that Name which you openly disgrace by your own immoralities and by your friendship with those who would so live.  If you are to be taken seriously, you must clothe yourself- for the words that proceed from the naked are hard to hear. 

Anoint thine eyes with eyesalve implies taking measures to recover one’s ability to perceive truth again- that thou mayest see.  I understand how naïve believers can fall prey to the errors set forth by the leaders of the modern “charismatic” movement, but I cannot understand how some never come to see through those errors.   OPEN YOUR EYES!

Lastly, the Lord counsels the lukewarm to repent:

As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent. Rev.3:19

And herein may the eyesalve be found.  For if you will be serious about truly submitting yourself to God, if you will “surrender all,” and with all of your heart turn from sin, then your eyes will be opened and your nakedness covered.  Your faith also will be as gold tried in the fire.   

And your righteousness will no longer be BECAUSE YOU SAY, but rather because it is.

Repentance Not to Be Repented of

For godly sorrow worketh repentance to salvation not to be repented of: but the sorrow of the world worketh death.  2 Corinthians 7:10

One of the most misunderstood, and I daresay neglected doctrines in the church today, is the doctrine of repentance.  When the word repentance is on occasion mentioned, it is usually either given a modern definition far from its true biblical meaning, or it is used by a preacher (with quivering voice) to shock the congregation into a rush for the altar for prayer.  Having observed both of these scenarios countless times, and having talked to countless Christians, as well as many, many ministers, I am convinced that it is a small minority within the evangelical church that actually understands what repentance is, and knows  what it means “to repent.”  For the most part, this small minority that does indeed understand, did not gain this understanding from the pulpit, but rather through a personal experience by the grace of God- for it is very possible, even probable, for one to attend church, or even bible school or seminary, and never hear a clear exposition of the subject. 

Now how can this be?  It is this simple.  If the pastor has never experienced true repentance, and if the bible teacher has not as well, they which hear them will certainly not gain much insight into the topic. For to be sure “out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh,” thus, if the minister is inexperienced with true repentance, he will not with any conviction or clarity preach it.  Rather, for the most part, he will neglect to speak of it - for he is not conscious of the importance of the subject, inasmuch as it is unfamiliar to him, having never been an integral part of his religious experience.

But how can a minister, or teacher, become such without having any experience with true repentance?  The answer: In the same way that he became a Christian without true repentance! For to be sure, the gospel that is preached in our day, does not require repentance as a condition of salvation, consequently, many people become “believers” without it.  Then, by a natural course of events, some of these believers- which have never experienced true repentance- eventually become ministers themselves, thereby perpetuating the cycle in which neither preacher nor parishioner is enlightened upon this vital subject.

Now you may fairly raise an objection to my assessment of the state of the modern evangelical church regarding true repentance.  You may even feel it outrageous for me to suggest that many ministers are bereft of true understanding regarding the subject.  However, once we examine what true repentance is, as it is set forth in our text from 2 Corinthians, you may come to see things in a different light.

In our examination of what true repentance is it will of necessity be helpful to first establish what repentance is not.

Repentance is not confession of sin.  Although confession of sin may certainly be involved in true repentance, it does not, however, define it.   Confession of sin is an acknowledgement of guilt, whereas repentance involves a change of mind and conduct.  It is very possible- and very common- to confess sin without ever having a proper change of mind and conduct.

Repentance is not asking for forgiveness. Again, one might ask for forgiveness while they are repenting, but one might just as easily ask for forgiveness without repentance.  In fact, many ask for forgiveness while being conscious that they have no intention of breaking off from their sins.  They know that what they do is wrong, thus the request for forgiveness, yet are unwilling to change their behaviour.

Repentance is not mere resolution.  In truth, repentance is resolution of the truest form.  However, mere resolution, that resolution or effort to do better without having a proper change of heart, is weak and results in an endless cycle of broken promises to one’s self and to God.

Repentance is not faith.  Many Christians are confused about this.  They somehow think that as long as they believe the gospel, that they have no need for repentance.  In fact, some ministers give the idea that believing the gospel is repentance.  As wonderful and precious as faith is, it should not be exalted at the expense of other truths.  Many believers are so imbalanced in their ideas regarding faith, that they cannot, or will not see the whole of biblical truth.  They approach every issue in the same way- believe, BELIEVE, BELIEVE!  They are like a man who calls himself a mechanic, yet possesses but one tool- the hammer!

Repentance is not remorse.  Although remorse is definitely part of repentance, and they which have truly repented indeed know their share of deep remorse, it must be stated that an individual can indeed experience remorse without ever truly repenting.  There exists a definite distinction between the remorse that the truly penitent experience and the remorse that the impenitent may feel.  This is precisely what Paul addresses in our text. 

Now regarding the text in 2 Corinthians 7:10, I will make three points: (1) The definition of repentance, (2) The catalyst of true repentance, and (3) The character of true repentance.

The definition of repentance

Having already established what repentance is not, we must now define what it indeed is.  The word translated as repentance comes from the Greek word metanoia, which means “after-thought, change of mind “or a “perceiving after.”  Thus we get our simple definition of repentance: a change of mind. But this raises the question: What is that change of mind that may properly be considered repentance? 

It must be stated here that not every change of mind can be considered repentance.  A person may form new opinions regarding sin, or the Bible, or of God, thus experiencing a change of thoughts, but this can hardly be considered repentance.  Likewise, one may decide to become a “positive person,” and refuse to think any negative thoughts, and thereby change his mind, but this too fails to represent what the biblical meaning of repentance consists in.  In fact, this positive thinking approach, or “faith” as many wrongly call it, is quite contrary to biblical repentance. 

So what is that change of mind that is repentance?  Firstly, the term mind, as used in the translation of metanoia, is intended to mean something much deeper than the way we often use the word.  It is intended to represent the seat of moral contemplation.  It is that faculty within man that is capable of deep thought and consideration, and in this case, reflection upon his moral actions and conduct.  The word mind here should be understood to mean mind-set.  It is the mind-set, or the inclination of the will, the ultimate intention, that undergoes a change in true repentance.

Now according to Paul, there are but two mind-sets that men may choose between:

For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit, the things of the Spirit. Romans 8:5

Thus, repentance may be defined as that change of mind, or ultimate intention, from the gratification of self to the glorifying of God.

The catalyst of true repentance

A chemist may at times add a substance to increase the rate or efficiency of a chemical reaction.  These substances are known as catalysts.  In our text, Paul speaks of a vital component to true repentance that may be thought of as a catalyst of repentance: godly sorrow.  Notice what he says: godly sorrow worketh repentance.  The repentance that Paul was so thankful for having occurred among the Corinthians was directly the result of godly sorrow.  This godly sorrow induced the Corinthians to have a genuine and deep change of mind. 

Now for those believers which consider anything negative to be of the devil, and only happy, positive things to be from God, there is a problem.  For this verse of scripture declares that there exists a sorrow- which is a negative- that is indeed godly, or of God.  Thus, as I stated earlier, those believers who in the name of faith, reject, resist, and rebuke all things which are negative are indeed quite contrary to the biblical doctrine of repentance, which we see is induced by a sorrow which is spoken of as godly.  I have known many Christians who are in doctrinal error, living contrary to the proper morals they once espoused, who yet hold to a “positive confession” of victory while they have none, and blessing while they in truth are fallen.  They are determined to maintain a faith in a positive only Christianity, when they would do well to let the misery which is their state lead to a godly sorrow which worketh repentance.

Now Paul contrasts two types of sorrow in this verse: godly sorrow, and the sorrow of this world.  Godly sorrow, as we have seen works or produces repentance, the sorrow of this world, or worldly sorrow, worketh death. We will now consider what is intended by these terms.

Godly sorrow is that sorrow which takes into consideration the feelings and welfare of God.  It is that sorrow which is characterized by deep regret for how we have treated God, how we have injured his Person, and abused his feelings.  Godly sorrow takes the individual out of his obsession with securing his own happiness, peace, and relief, and brings him into a state where he truly sympathizes with God.  In godly sorrow, the individual cares ultimately for God’s well-being; his own welfare he no longer regards.  He is no longer driven to relieve his own guilt, nor is he fixated with finding forgiveness; he cares only for the Lord whom he has offended.

I am certain that many which read what I have just written will find this very foreign language.  Sadly, many “believers” will consider this unnecessary, and even sadder, some will scoff at this, stating that “no one” comes to God, nor experiences repentance in this way.  Yet they which are truly penitent can and do identify with what I have written: for it is their experience, and they know it to be true.  And they which have experienced such things, and felt such things, can only wonder at those believers which have never experienced the same, and shudder at those which would dare to scoff.

Now the sorrow of the world of which Paul speaks is to the contrary.  It is that sorrow over sin which is self-centered.  It laments over how wrong decisions have affected one’s self, and is ultimately concerned with how those sins may jeopardize one’s eternal state, or ability to receive divine blessing and assistance.  The sorrow of this world laments its own losses, and never rises to consider the sufferings of God.  It does not despise sin, but only the effects of sin.  It is the grief of Esau, weeping over the realization of forfeited blessings, but unable to weep over the sins that secured this forfeiture.   It is called the sorrow of the world, for it is ultimately selfish, and thus bears the same characteristic of the unregenerate or worldly.  It worketh death- for it never leads to repentance acceptable to God.

The character of true repentance

The character, or nature, of true repentance is set forth in our text by the expression not to be repented of. A repentance not to be repented of may seem to be a strange statement.  However, it simply means this: A changing of the mind from which one will not return.  It is a repentance that we will not take back or regret, a repentance that we will continue in, and one in which we will not have a “change of mind” concerning our initial change of mind.

And herein must the doctrine of the perseverance of the saints be understood.  The saints do not possess an eternal security by the arbitrary will of God regardless of what fruit is or is not manifest within their lives, but rather the saints persevere because they have experienced repentance not to be repented of.  They have sympathized with God, they have felt his pain that their sin has caused, and they cannot return again to behaviour that is offensive to him.    Thus, they persevere in godliness- not merely a profession of godliness- but an actual practice of godliness as it is defined in scripture.

So we see that the character of true repentance is that of continuance.  For time, and the course of life, will prove that many which seemed to begin well, in truth did not.  For when believers condone the practices that they once condemned, and return to the things that they have once repented of, thereby repenting of their initial repentance, does it not suggest that perhaps in the beginning they were amiss?  It does for certain show their inexperience with godly sorrow, for if they had begun on that path, they would be constrained to continue in it.

And so the question, “How do you define repentance?”  If my commentary is strange to you, know that it is familiar to the saints throughout the ages.  I would suggest that you do not dismiss it, for true repentance has always been the same in every generation whether we have experienced it or not.  It is quite certain that men will define repentance according to that which they have experienced. If your definition is wanting, it is likely your experience is as well.

Have you godly sorrow?  Have you true remorse?  Does your heart feel for Christ and his sufferings? Blessed are the poor in spirit, blessed are they which mourn, blessed are the meek: for theirs is the kingdom, and the comfort, and the joy of a repentance-   not to be repented of.